POA is one of the mother’s children.
She is currently living in one of her rental homes with the POA, his wife, adult granddaughter and her boyfriend. This was to be temporary while the mother received rehab. treatment. Treatment was completed months ago.
The mother wants to move back home and could with some limited daily help. She has requested the POA make it happen for months. No movement has been made by the POA.
After numerous requests by the mother's other sons the mother was allowed to visit and spend a weekend with one. For the first time in almost a year she was able to see all her other children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.
During that visit the mother slowly opened up and shared concerning facts about her treatment, and care while living with the POA's family. She asked to extend her visit and shared she was scarred to return to the POA, in fear of retaliation for sharing and not following all their rules while she was visiting.
The POA was contacted and when informed by his mother of her desire he refused to allow her to extend her stay. POA refused to bring her additional medicine so she could stay a few days longer. Advised he would block any efforts to secure additional medicine at the RX so that she could extend her stay... ETC.... to avoid arguing the mother eventually agreed to return to them (as she had several doctor visits for that week). It was agreed she would return to her other sons home for an extended visit in 3 days (after the doctor visits, the second son had offered to take his mother to the doctor visits but the POA refused).
When the day came for the return visit the POA refused to allow the visit. The POA has further refused that son from coming to visit or even to face to face check on his mother. A third son is also denied visitation. The POA will not allow either son to speak to mother on the phone.
The POA offers no reason for not allowing the visit; he just refuses it, stating he has the power and authority to do so.
POA advises mother is competent.
What action is appropiate?
After much discussion the two brothers suggested mediation to the POA. The POA stated that if the two other brothers showed up for a meeting at "his" attorney's office to workk out details on returning their mother home they could then visit the mother.
Note: the information from the POA prior to the mothers visit was vastly inaccurate with regard to her abilities when visiting. The brothers do not feel they can base any detailed planning on the POA's information and are concerned the mothers doctor may be receiving the same apparent misiniformation. The POA's report on her abilities was far less than what was observed.
The two sons responded that if the POA wanted their input in developing a detailed plan, and their assistance to impliment it they needed::
1. To have the mother visit for 2-3 weeks so that they could observe her day to day and formulate a clearer picture of what she could and could not do.
2. At the end of the visit go with her to a doctor visit for a discussion.
3. Afterwhich they would be happy to sit down with the POA, with the mother in attendance, and work out the details of a plan.
The POA refused. He advises they cannot see their mother, cannot talk to her, cannot go with her to her doctor, and that the mother cannot attend the meeting.
The two brothers then in desperation stated ... ok..... they would attend the meeting but wouldn't be informed enough to sign off on any detailed plan. None the less they would show up, listen, and ask questions. In return they wanted assurance from the POA that when the meeting was over that they could take their mother for an extended visit (as he had orginally advised if attended the meeting they could visit her).
The POA refused. Ranted about how the two brothers could out vote him and he and his family would loose and he wasn't going to allow that. He states that the two brothers and the mother are against him.
It appeares the POA wants to have a meeting, tell the brothers how it was going to be, get them to agree and commit to help with "his" plan (which the POA has advised he doesn't have??), and spring it on the mother.
The POA continues to make comments he has the power and authority to deny visits and control her.
In frustation the brothers advised him to put together a plan by himself and make it happen. The mother has advised him she wants to go home and they feel that as her agent he is to make it happen.
In the meantime they want to visit their mother and reminded him she was requested visits with them.
Again the POA refuses
The brothers are upset and confused as to the motive of the POA. After all it is suppose to be about what is in the mothers best interest.
Changing the POA is perhaps this is what the current POA fears. Perhaps he is concerned about what additional information mom will share.... She does have some slight memory issues.... maybe he wants to keep her until she is incompetent.... perhaps she has signed documents the brothers don't know about and the POA doesn't want those documents nulled.
Who knows.
I'd think if she wants to see them or visit them or whatever it should just happen.
The home she is at the mother owns. So to see her the would be on property owned by the mother.
She is competent.
Do they physically go to the house and if refused entry by the other family members living there enter anyway?
Hate to take it to that level.
However the brothers are running out of options. That is why we came here to post and see if there were options we were not aware of, ideas someone else had tried and failed or had success with.
They want to be reasonable.
It just seems simple.
If she is competent she can decide for herself.
I'd think they should be able to just drive up, knock on the door and see her or take her out of the house if that is what she would like.
Will Adult Services advise the outcome of their involvment/investigation if called?
I had an aunt whose children had POA over literally everything in her life. It even gave them the right to decide her personal relationships. I think that they had convinced her that she needed their protection. No, they needed the secrecy. By the time she died, anything of value that she'd owned was gone. She'd given it all away to them, but they still ignored her. A couple of her nieces found her sitting in the floor on evening, taking her clothes off and putting them back on. She had several pain patches on her at once. And no, she wasn't taken to the hospital until a few days after, of course, the pain patches had been removed. I would imagine that they wanted some time for the meds to wear off before anyone actually examined her. She died less than a month later. And this woman who wasn't illiterate signed a new POA with an "x" less than two weeks before she died. Only that one didn't mention anything about her personal relationships. Gee, does it seem to you that they didn't want anyone to know about that little provision in the first one?
And how do I know about the POAs? In this state, it's public record. It's all easily available at no charge on the county's website. Frankly, an evening of combing through scanned images of POAs and deeds online left me sick to my stomach. At the time, I lived in another state and wasn't here. I used to call her, but her hearing got so bad that she couldn't hear me on the telephone any longer. I am my own mother's caregiver and couldn't leave her to go and see for myself what was going on. I wish I could have. You have no idea how much I do.
The two days the brothers had with her was eye opening for them....not only the revealing of bits of what had been going on for 11 months but the level of fear and hopelessness in their mother.
However if the brothers were to make a report and provided information of other family members and friends that visited with their mom the two days they had her and snips of what they are aware of from other limited exposure .... maybe APS woudl dig deeper and not just walk away is mom isn't the most forth coming. ???
Has anyone had direct experience with APS?
If mom isn't the most forthcoming, for the reason mentioned above, how will APS handle the complaint?
Would APS continue with the investigation and contact others that the brothers listed as having knowledge even if mom was not forth coming?
Take any and all names of folks that your mother spoke to with you to APS, along with phone numbers and addresses, so that APS can contact them and get a clearer picture of just why you are so concerned. If you have any e-mails or any letters, take them with you as well. It seems that no matter what you do, your brother rejects even his own conditions that he demands of you. You have witnesses as to what has been said by your mom. Please don't wait any longer.
They have witnesses to the refusals, the mother sharing her fears, concerns and desires, etc....
Have to pray that the APS rep is experienced enough to pursue the matter fully, contact those they might list, perhaps even get the mother away from the POA for several days (to stay with the other brothers) and re interview her where she might feel safer.
Again thanks to all. If anyone thinks of anything else or has had direct experience with APS please share any info you can that might be meaningful.
How long does the average APS investigation take to conclude once it is started. In our state we always hear that the SWers are over worked with to many clients and have problems getting the bases covered. We are sure they are dedicated but it is what it is. Probably the same problem in every state.
Will they continue the investigation if the mother isn't interested or attempts to cover things up but just not being forth coming? The brothers feel that if the APS goes beyond a visit with their mother they will find there is reason for concern and further investigation. But...will APS contact those folks if the mother isn't interested???
Good luck and hope it works out.
I think the brothers hate the idea of bringing conflict to a head by showing up with the police...it is just sort of in your face. Yet besides calling APS it may be the only option that will allow them to visit her, providing the Sheriff asks the mother and the mother is willing to stand up for herself and say "yes I want to see them".
During her short 2 day visit she expressed strong emotions about her concerns of how she would be treated upon her return to the POA. Enough of a display off and on throughout her visit that one had to wonder if the concerns she shared were the complete story.
Balancing seeing her and not wanting to do something to make her treatment even worse is an obvious concern.
The motive behind the POA's refusal to allow the brothers to communicate with the mother is distrubing. The POA and his family's controlling role when the mother is reportably competent is alarming to me.
The idea of perhaps calling the Sheriff and giving him a heads up before going to the home to attempt a visit is well worth consideration,..as is calling APS....or perhaps doing both. Something needs to be done since conversations with the POA have proven fruitless.
Calling APS is the first step. Her bits and pieces of information and the fact that she was scared to return should have warranted a call to APS before she returned to her own home, because practically speaking, he's living in the house that SHE owns.
Today is Tuesday. Call APS now. She's living in fear of what can happen unless she does exactly what POA wants and no one should have to live in fear of another person, especially when that person is their own son. She needs YOUR help, so get on the telephone with APS and get the ball rolling today. Let APS call the sheriff. As a matter of fact, if POA resists APS, THEY'LL call the police. They can do what needs to be done to protect her, but they can't do it without a complaint from YOU.
I may be wrong but I doubt the brothers are overly concerned with stepping on the POA's toes. :)
Thanks again! I beileve the brothers have or are proceeding.
POA continues to refuse family phone conversations with mother, or visits. He advised that the mothers condition has taken a massive downward turn since the 2day visit with her sons.
Both brothers went to visit their mom unannounced. The mother was sharp, able to walk throughout the home without physical assistance. In short was appeared in as good functioning shape as the weeked before when she visited her extended family weeks ago.
She asked to go home or to their home. She accepted offer from them to come with them to their home and stay for an extended time. POA refused and stated she could not leave.
Deep dark bruises were noticed and viewed by sons that went from mothers shoulder to wrist on both arms. POA offered no explanation. POA commented that the doctor had been called but she had not seen the doctor.
Police were called by the brothers. Police reviewed all documents shown by POA and advised him documents were over finances and did not give him power of her as a person. Other documents were not legal documents. Asked if POA had mother declaired incomipent. POA stated no and at no time did he assert that she was incompitent.
Police viewed bruses but asked no questions of mother or POA. He did ask brothrs if they were making allegations. They apparently advised they wanted the officer to see the bruising and do what was appropriate.
The officer asked the mother if she wanted to go home and she said yes, gave the address of her home and advised him that the home she was currently in was also property owned by her.
The POA's daughter stated that she wanted the brother out of her home and off the property. Mom advised the girl that mom owned the property not her. The girl stated that she lived there to, as a renter (no rent is paid) and she had her rights to order the brothers out.
POA threated the police by stating that if he allowed the mother to leave that he would be responsible if anything went wrong.
In the end the police stepped away and talked with her superior. He returned and stated that they did not want to be involved and suggested civil action. The brother asked what civil action. The mother is compitent and she should be the one seeking legal action and can't because she can't leave. officer mentioned going for custody. Brother asked why would they and how could they get custody of someone of age who is compitent? Officer stated he was just doing what his superviser told him to do. He suggested the brothers leave since they had been asked too. When the brothers stated that their mother owned the property and had already told the officer she didn't want them to leave ... the officer said that complicated things but he suggested they leave and he could do nothing.
The officer commented that he tried to reach another officer about the bruising but that he was involved in another arrest so he could discuss it with him. He would discuss the matter with him when he was available.
The brothers left without their mom.
Ok..... so now what??? Any solid suggestions?