Here's my proposal. No one can talk about Obamacare, except on this thread. People on both sides have very strong feelings. Express them here, and keep them out of other threads.
I personally have benefitted from RomneyCare, so I am willing to give Obamacare a chance.
WhirledTravel, did you not qualify for some type of subsidy? I had bcbs insurance for years. It cost $350 a month before the ACA. The premiums nearly doubled when the ACA went into effect. I couldn't afford that, so I went to the marketplace and qualified for a subsidy. This year my premium had increased to almost $1.1K a month, but the subsidy also increased. I have very little income coming in, but I have retirement savings, so couldn't qualify for Medicaid even if I wanted to. I was grateful for the subsidy, because I wouldn't be able to afford the increase in the cost of premiums without it. The trouble is that I would have preferred to be able to pay totally by myself. It hurt my pride to have to have a subsidy.
The response of the insurance companies and the politicians pretty much doomed the ACA. There was a lot that went on. This morning the POTUS signed something that will make the ACA even worse. Too bad Congress couldn't work to fix the problems with ACA instead of causing even more chaos in our healthcare.
BTW, Medicare is also on the chopping block
Things need work, of course, but, I think it's possible to make it work. For people who have medical conditions that are out of their control, like Type I diabetes, epilepsy, etc. staying alive without health coverage is not possible. Insulin, supplies, blood tests are so pricey.
It's good for some and not good for others - and I've personally experienced both of these effects. I support helping people less fortunate - but I also don't want the government in my face telling me I'm required to buy a product (especially one with details I don't need such as a vasectomy coverage when I'm clearly a female!) that meets their approval - or else I'll have to pay a fine.
I'm Independent politically because I like a little bit of both parties. However, I don't believe "we're all in this together" kind of mantra. Everyone bears some personal responsibility for their lifestyle choices that eventually affect their health. Why should I help subsidize the coverage, why should my premiums increase for a person who needs diabetic medication but refuses to lose weight and cut back on their poor diet habits?
The UK has already implemented rationing - to save their socialized healthcare system from bankruptcy. Last year, it was reported in Forbes Magazine that obese and smokers will no longer be eligible for knee and hip surgeries. And other types of rationing is expected.
If something isn't done to control costs - whatever this is - in our healthcare system, eventually we'll also see extreme rationing here.
It's not rocket science, it's just simple economics 101: You can't keep expanding and expanding the demand of healthcare, i.e. Obamacare, when the supply (taxpayers and business) will eventually run out out steam and then there's little means to refuel the supply.
There's a reason why the very wealthy overseas living in a socialized healthcare system pay - whatever it takes - to come to the USA for their medical treatments.
Our healthcare system isn't perfect by far - but we have choices - and we take very, very good care of the indigent via Medicaid.
Sunnygirl, what has saved a lot of lives? Obamacare? Not for everyone. A good friend of mine died of cancer last year because he couldn't afford insurance, as a direct result of Obamacare. When he was diagnosed with cancer, he was told that his treatment would cost him a minimum of $500,000. That's insane. So, he couldn't do the treatment, and passed away 8 months later.
Another example: My husband and I are self-employed. Once Obamacare went into effect, I lost my doctor that I had had for over 20 years, and our premiums doubled, and then doubled again. Our cost this year would have been $1,200 a month, with a $6,000 deductible!! Could you afford that? We can't, so we have no health insurance. (And yes, the $1,200 is even through the ACA.) I'm in my 40's, quite healthy, and for the first time in my life, can't afford insurance. And no, we don't have high income. It was either pay our mortgage, or pay for insurance.
I can tell you countless more stories from people that I know directly, who now have insanely high premiums, or can no longer afford insurance. And, I've actually had people say to me, "Well, at least the poor people have insurance now." How is that ok?? How is it better, when millions of middle class, hard working Americans can no longer afford insurance? It's not all warm and fuzzy stories of people getting great insurance for $87 a month, so people need to get their heads out of the sand, and realize that the system is still broken. I actually had a friend who is A NURSE walk out of the room while I was telling her how Obamacare has affected me. She thinks it's great, and didn't want to hear my side of things. That's unacceptable. You can't just pretend that there aren't people who are hurting, as a direct result of Obamacare.
Which is fine and lovely, but...
She also did six months' training in HIV medicine at the same hospital, and as far as I remember not one of the in-patients was a UK citizen. Not one. These people did *need* their treatment, and never mind facilities, in the sort of places they came from even being diagnosed with HIV would lead to total ostracism or worse. I am glad they received good care. But we are a small and insolvent country, it's no use pretending we can just magic up resources out of thin air no matter how worthy the cause.
Another of their complaints (these are a really nice group of PCP’s) is that there are only a few inhalers to treat asthma & COPD and the cost of those inhalers are all so high and the docs don’t have alternatives thus this is a cost they can’t control.
Another thing we discussed was the high rate of rehospitalizations. PCP’s get “dinged” on this. The docs stated the real reason the rehospitalization rates are so high is because the hospital discharges sick patients too quickly. I know from being a RN that folks are discharged with no teaching the families or even the patient on what to do to get healthy. No discharge planning and it is heartbreaking.
I only wish we could have a honest bipartisan discussion about something so important that is 20% of spending in the US. I am actually plenty disgusted with both parties.
But there's no reason why financial companies couldn't devise some kind of payment plan, instead. Except that it would probably be unaffordable for many people.
Cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes... we don't want people to die from preventable causes. But large numbers of the people suffering from these conditions simply do not have (and never did have anything like) the money it costs to live with them. So, okay - how much, and who's paying?
I get the impression that John McCain can't see anything much past a red mist these days, can he? - and who can blame him. Ahh, the art of outraging abso-bloody-lutely everyone! I don't think I've ever seen it accomplished quite so thoroughly as this before.
Single payer will indeed be worse.
I am disappointed in Congress’ inability to get anything done re ACA yet...thank you Senator McCain who actually campaigned for reelection toting the need to repeal & revise the ACA (the opposite platform) and then voted against it. People in Arizona are struggling to get coverage as their marketplace choices are few.
The ACA needs to be rewired. For those with preexisting conditions, I agree they should be covered & think that will continue.
We need free market insurance as yes there are only a few carriers left. Monopolies should not be allowed.
I have no idea how anyone can afford the insurances offered through ACA. My mother's insurance went from $380 a month for BC/BS, $20 copays, $0 deductible for office and routine visits, and $1000 deductible for catistrophic prior to Obama and ACA. Also, she had cancer in early 2000s and it remained the same coverage, basically the same price, and she was not dropped. Then Obama was elected and her insurance premiums for the exact same coverage went up several hundred dollars a year. This went on for several years and she had to keep getting different insurance for worse coverage and was paying a lot more than the $380 she had been paying. By the time she was able to get Medicare, she only had 2 insurance companies to choose from and her insurance was $1240 a month for $10,000 deductible for catastrophic, $5,000 deductible for routine doctor visits before her insurance would kick in and then she would pay $35 copays.
ACA has greatly benefited the insurance companies. Their revenue jumped dramatically and their coverage is now minimal. Hats off to the insurance lobbyists who were able to push this through D.C. Single payer would be worse as competition is what drives prices down.
The only way to have truly competitive and the best insurance is to make insurance companies have to compete for people to buy their insurance. Currently they have quassi monopolies divided by states. Policies should be truly free market. The free market works for the benefit of the buyer and government works for itself (politicians) and lobbyists these days anyways.
A long time ago, someone said that government has wanted to get its mitts on the money from the health sector. It wants the money, period.
Also, as far as I'm concerned you can always tell Obama is lying is when his mouth moves.
don't trust government any farther than you can overthrow it.
Learn more about the mandatory mail program President Obama signed into law.
After March 14th, 2014, TRICARE For Life (TFL) beneficiaries, taking select medications, will be required to switch to TRICARE Pharmacy Home Delivery or a military pharmacy. Those who continue to fill at a retail pharmacy will pay 100% of the cost of their medication after two fills.
Hopefully our Elderly Military retirees have other health insurance besides Tricare for Life.
HAIL TO THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE ARMED FORCES DICTATOR WHO NEVER SERVED AND GETS FREE HEALTHCARE FOR HIM AND HIS FAMILY!
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2013/12/healthcare-gov-adds-window-shopping-feature/index.htm
Furthermore, how do I know a website is legit? Are there any websites that are neutral, no vested interest, on the subject? I personally can't trust a government-ran website that was messed up at the onset.
Yea right like I have a choice
One thing, though, when I looked at the exchange, I saw that most policys have a "coinsurance" rather than a "copay". Not a fan of coinsurance. If you have 20% coinsurance a $200 doctor visit would cost $40. Right now my copay for a regular doctor is $25.. and $40 for a specialist. We were told that next years plan may have coinsurance. Yuck.
Go to legit websites to get your answers to the Affordable Care Act.
And don't forget, those who are losing their health insurance are doing so because said insurance did not qualify under the guidelines, which is very important. If you went to the ER or had to have surgery/hospitalization, that insurance wouldn't cover 10% or 20% of the total cost... you would be responsible for the vast majority of the expense.
If you did have excellent insurance and the insurance company is leaving your area, it would have left no matter if the Affordable Care Act was in place or not. Health care insurance is a business no different than any other business. If they find the competition to high in an area, they will close shop in that area.
There are no medically specific questions asked when you apply at healthcare.gov, other than whether or not you smoke. Previously when you applied for PRIVATE health insurance you had to disclose all of your pre-existing conditions. Thanks to the ACA that is a thing of the past. You can not be denied insurance due to pre-existing conditions. As a result there is no reason for anyone to disclose them. (Thank you President Obama!)